English | Bahasa Malaysia
Search
 
 
 
 
 
Food for Thought
Text Size A A A

Dear friends, welcome to my piara.com.my. You are invited to give comments on the blog enteries below.

RM 1.74 Billion Estimated Loss of Revenue Due To Non-Revenue Water In Year 2010

PRESS RELEASE

DATE: 5th JANUARY 2012 (THURSDAY)

RM 1.74 BILLION ESTIMATED LOSS OF REVENUE DUE TO NON-REVENUE WATER IN YEAR 2010 

Association of Water and Energy Research Malaysia (AWER) has carried out Non-Revenue Water (NRW) modelling study based on year 2010 statistics from Malaysia Water Industry Guide 2011. The NRW percentage shows a drop from 36.63% in year 2009 to 36.37% in year 2010. However, the overall volume of treated water loss has recorded an increase from 1.80 billion cubic meters (m3) in year 2009 to 1.87 billion cubic meters (m3) in year 2010 or equivalent to 3.5% increase.

AWER used lowest tariff for domestic and commercial sectors, consumption percentage for domestic and commercial sectors as well as total volume of NRW as basic parameters for the modelling.

The result of the tabulation is as below:

Total Estimated Loss of Revenue due to NRW
Year 2008  Year 2009  Year 2010
RM  1,617,358,972.42  RM  1,626,240,834.28  RM  1,744,674,131.76

Total revenue for water sector in year 2010 is RM 4,086,618,000. The estimated loss of revenue due to NRW is almost 42.7% of the total revenue in water services sector. The sum of estimated revenue loss due to NRW for the year 2008, 2009 and 2010 is a staggering RM 4.99 Billion.

For volume of NRW losses in year 2010, Selangor records the highest amount followed by Pahang and Sabah. However, when NRW losses is converted into estimated loss of revenue, the highest amount is recorded by Selangor (RM 599 Million) followed by Johor (RM 200.9 Million) and Sabah (RM 175.4 Million). [More details can be seen in Table 1 and Table 2].

AWER is still standing firm on our proposed target of 20% National NRW level by year 2020 as national indicator for water industry set last year. National Water Services Commission (SPAN) have refuted that the 20% target is not achievable and not economical. Unfortunately, there was no calculation or modelling done by SPAN to prove this. Surprisingly, recently SPAN reported that 25% NRW target can be achieved way before 2020. Is the regulator setting an easy target to achieve via ad-hoc basis?
 
To achieve this 20% NRW value, all water operators must be regulated under Water Services Industry Act 2006 (WSIA). Through this, stricter Key Performance Index (KPI) and a National NRW Reduction Action Plan must be put in place. KPI must also be set for officers in SPAN and Ministry of Energy, Green Technology and Water (KeTTHA) to ensure that the National NRW Reduction Action Plan will be prepared for the whole of Malaysia by mid of 2012. There is no point of having central agencies that pass this work to water operators and wait for results without proper planning.

The action plan must contain the following:
  (i) Detailed targets must be specified for each state with specified time frame;
 (ii) Critical, sub-critical and non-critical areas identification;
(iii) Detailed technical guideline;
(iv) Strict Capital Expenditure (Capex) and Operational Expenditure (Opex) Audit for NRW reduction plans;
 (v) Action plan should also be made available for public to view.

AWER urges the state governments that have not transferred to WSIA regime to speed up their process. Delay in restructuring will only delay improvement of water services infrastructures and deny good services to the rakyat. We also urge Sabah and Sarawak to develop a similar framework to improve water services industry there and eventually to be regulated under WSIA.

Malaysia needs to learn to manage NRW holistically. KeTTHA and SPAN must have a National NRW Reduction Action Plan by 30th June 2012. No more excuses as every drop counts!


Piarapakaran S.
President
Association of Water and Energy Research Malaysia (AWER)

Table 1: Estimated Cost for Non-Revenue Water by AWER for Year 2008, 2009 and 2010

State

2008

2009

2010

Estimated cost
for NRW (RM)

Ranking

Estimated cost
for NRW (RM)

Ranking

Estimated cost
for NRW (RM)

Ranking

Johor

208,723,970.62

2

210,330,186.68

2

200,942,867.00

2

Kedah

116,178,177.60

5

118,016,700.80

5

140,882,636.70

4

Kelantan

39,960,710.40

10

39,665,152.15

11

47,570,766.60

10

Labuan

5,143,500.00

14

4,110,300.00

14

4,041,900.00

14

Melaka

36,319,283.04

11

42,857,985.60

10

38,098,973.84

11

Negeri Sembilan

102,226,991.00

6

108,389,664.24

6

114,047,736.00

6

Penang

23,794,255.20

12

26,568,356.40

12

32,928,804.84

12

Pahang

120,093,842.72

4

136,582,674.96

4

132,854,905.28

5

Perak

90,330,825.60

7

90,442,400.23

7

93,328,496.80

7

Perlis

9,914,314.86

13

11,274,730.64

13

16,027,089.12

13

Sabah

150,600,600.00

3

142,392,600.00

3

175,434,300.00

3

Sarawak

75,515,558.04

8

79,515,015.30

8

86,267,564.60

8

Selangor

582,256,047.36

1

557,987,210.88

1

598,964,961.50

1

Terengganu

56,300,895.98

9

58,107,856.40

9

63,283,129.48

9

TOTAL

1,617,358,972.42

 

1,626,240,834.28

 

1,744,674,131.76

 

(Note: Ranking is listing from highest to lowest)

Table 2: Volume of Non-Revenue Water (in cubic meters / m3) for Year 2008, 2009 and 2010

State

2008

2009

2010

*Volume of NRW(cubic meters / m3)

Ranking

*Volume of NRW(cubic meters / m3)

Ranking

*Volume of NRW(cubic meters / m3)

Ranking

Johor

163,831,000

5

170,914,000

4

160,883,000

5

Kedah

190,581,000

2

192,586,000

3

188,019,000

4

Kelantan

61,568,000

10

60,479,000

10

72,066,000

10

Labuan

5,715,000

14

4,567,000

14

4,491,000

14

Melaka

47,163,000

12

48,060,000

12

42,037,000

12

Negeri Sembilan

122,900,000

6

118,248,000

6

114,690,000

8

Penang

55,387,000

11

63,585,000

11

63,633,000

11

Pahang

177,046,000

3

200,127,000

2

194,962,000

2

Perak

115,785,000

7

116,389,000

7

116,138,000

7

Perlis

16,509,000

13

17,779,000

13

27,592,000

13

Sabah

167,334,000

4

158,214,000

5

194,927,000

3

Sarawak

102,843,000

8

109,305,000

8

120,806,000

6

Selangor

483,184,000

1

465,548,000

1

481,135,000

1

Terengganu

76,034,000

9

78,397,000

9

85,972,000

9

TOTAL

1,785,880,000

 

1,804,198,000

 

1,867,351,000

 

(*Source: Malaysia Water Industry Guide 2010 & 2011)
(Note: Ranking is listing from highest to lowest)

Comments (0 Posted)

No Record Found!

Records Per Page
Displaying Page of

Leave your comment or suggestion

Email (will not be shared, required)
Comment / Suggestion
  Please enter word in the below image:

Not readable? Change text.


 
   
 
Announcement


 
 
 
 
   
   
 
Copyright © 2010 - 2011 piara.com.my. All Rights Reserved.